At the time I thought ‘Cool! I always wanted to be a person that read the New Yorker.’ Note my phrasing there….I didn’t actually want to READ the New Yorker, so much as be a person who did. This goes along with all my ideas of what adult life is like. Adults read magazines that have more words than pictures (damn, that rules out US). This is much like when I decided I wanted to be a person who read the Economist. To further this goal, I tested the waters by finding a friend who actually received the Economist and tried reading it. Damn. Have you read that stuff? The “interesting article” to “mind numbingly boring article” ratio is completely out of whack. My experiment led to great doubt that ANYone actually read the Economist. I think they just buy it and leave it on their coffee table so people will think they are the type of person who reads the Economist, knowing full well that no one will have actually tried to read it, thereby reducing the chances that their cover will be blown when someone wants to discuss the macroeconomic disarray that Pakistan currently finds itself in. (I’m pretty sure I’m going to get lit up by one of my smarty-pants Rice friends for this assumption. Someone who most likely not only reads the Economist, but highlights passages for further consideration. So be it. You're a better person than me.)
Anyways this brings us back to the New Yorker (not really, but I was done with Economist). So several years ago I started receiving it. The thing about a weekly magazine is that it comes, well, weekly. This isn’t an issue when the most thought provoking section of the magazine is how stars (insert totally mundane task of choice)
*Yes these words were really printed in the New Yorker.
**I don’t really store them in the stove Mom, that would be dangerous.




